Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Democrats protecting Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Democrats protecting Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 7, 2010

Inherited from Whom? Setting the record straight on “the policies that created this mess in the first place.”

One of the most frustrating things about this current administration and the current Democrat members of the House and the Senate is the never-ending "Blame Bush" strategy.

What they fail to mention is that the Dems have been in power in the House and Senate since 2006.  What they also fail to mention is that President Bush predicted this financial disaster in EARLY 2004 and did everything possible to get Congress to rein in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

What they also fail to mention is that the "Clinton Surplus" came at a time when Republicans were in power in the House and the Senate.

Mr.Sowell has hit the nail on the head with this article today.  Please get this article out to all that you can and make it viral!!!  It is the truth that needs to be one of the focus' of election ads...along with repealing all of the socialist, union backing, anti business bills that have been passed and reining in the various agencies that are going around Congress to implement agendas dear to this administration's heart.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Inherited from Whom? Setting the record straight on “the policies that created this mess in the first place.” 
September 7, 2010


Pres. Barack Obama boldly proclaims, “The buck stops here!” But whenever his policies are criticized, he acts as if the buck stopped with George W. Bush.

The party line that we are likely to be hearing from now until the November elections is that Obama “inherited” the big federal budget deficits and that he has to “clean up the mess” left in the economy by the Republicans. This may convince those who want to be convinced, but it will not stand up under scrutiny.


No president of the United States can create either a budget deficit or a budget surplus. All spending bills originate in the House of Representatives and all taxes are voted into law by Congress.


Democrats controlled both houses of Congress before Barack Obama became president. The deficit he inherited was created by the congressional Democrats, including Sen. Barack Obama, who did absolutely nothing to oppose the runaway spending. He was one of the biggest of the big spenders.


The last time the federal government had a budget surplus, Bill Clinton was president, so it was called “the Clinton surplus.” But Republicans controlled the House of Representatives, where all spending bills originate, for the first time in 40 years. It was also the first budget surplus in more than a quarter of a century.


The only direct power that any president has that can affect deficits and surpluses is the power to veto spending bills. President Bush did not veto enough spending bills, but Senator Obama and his fellow Democrats in control of Congress were the ones who passed the spending bills.


Today, with Barack Obama in the White House, allied with Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi in charge in Congress, the national debt is a bigger fraction of the annual national output than it has been in more than half a century. And that fraction is projected to continue going up for years to come, becoming larger than national output in 2012.


Having created this scary situation, President Obama now says, “Don’t give in to fear. Let’s reach for hope.” The voters reached for hope when they elected Obama. The fear comes from what he has done since taking office.


“The worst thing we could do is to go back to the very same policies that created this mess in the first place,” he said recently. “In November, you’re going to have that choice.”


Another political fable is that the current economic downturn is due to not enough government regulation of the housing and
financial markets. But it was precisely the government regulators, under pressure from politicians, who forced banks and other lending institutions to lower their standards for making mortgage loans.

These risky loans, and the defaults that followed, were what set off a
chain reaction of massive financial losses that brought down the whole economy.

Was this due to George W. Bush and the Republicans? Only partly. Most of those who pushed the lowering of mortgage-lending standards were Democrats — notably Rep. Barney Frank and Sen. Christopher Dodd — though too many Republicans went along.


At the heart of these policies were Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which bought huge amounts of risky mortgages, passing the risk on from the banks that lent the money (and made the profits) to the taxpayers that were not even aware that they would end up paying in the end.


When President Bush said in 2004 that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac should be reined in, 76
members of the House of Representatives issued a statement to the contrary. These included Barney Frank, Nancy Pelosi, Maxine Waters, and Charles Rangel.

If we are going to talk about “the policies that created this mess in the first place,” let’s at least get the facts straight and the names right.


The current policies of the Obama administration are a continuation of the same reckless policies that brought on the current economic problems — all in the name of “change.” Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are still sacred cows in Washington, even though they have already required the biggest bailouts of all.


Why? Because they allow politicians to direct vast sums of money where it will do politicians the most good, either personally or in terms of buying votes in the next election.


— Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution. © 2010 Creators Syndicate, Inc.

For the article, you can find it Here

Tuesday, May 11, 2010

DEMS PROTECTING FANNIE AND FREDDIE AGAIN! WHERE'S THE OUTRAGE?

Senate Dems Vote Down GOP Plan To Reform Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac As Their Sacred Cows Ask For $19 Billion More In Taxpayer Funds

SEN. MARK WARNER (D-VA) YESTERDAY: “I Think It’s A Fair Claim To Make That We Haven’t Done Enough To Fully Address Fannie And Freddie. It Is The Big Elephant In The Room That Hasn’t Been Addressed.” (CNBC’s “Squawk Box,” 5/10/10)

BUT SENATE DEMS CONTINUE TO TURN BLIND EYE TO FANNIE, FREDDIE BY KILLING GOP PLAN TO REFORM “MOST EXPENSIVE LEGACY” OF FINANCIAL CRISIS
Senate Democrats Like Michael Bennet (CO), Barbara Boxer (CA), Kirsten Gillibrand (NY), Blanche Lincoln (AR), Patty Murray (WA), Harry Reid (NV) And Arlen Specter (PA) Just Killed GOP Plan That Would Have Ended Taxpayer Bailouts Of Fannie Mae And Freddie Mac. (S. 3217, S. Amdt. 3839, Roll Call Vote #139, Rejected 43-56, R: 41-0, D: 2-54, I: 0-2, 5/11/10)
  • That Means Obama-Dodd Financial Regulation Bill Leaves Fannie Mae And Freddie Mac “Untouched.” “Home lending giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will be left untouched for now by financial reform legislation, Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) said Tuesday. Corker, a member of the Senate Banking Committee who’s been a lead Republican negotiator on a financial reform bill, said that the legislation under consideration wouldn’t deal with the two government-administered companies, but that lawmakers hope to revisit regulation of the companies soon. ‘I would have liked to have seen the Fannie and Freddie reforms in this bill,’ Corker said during an appearance on CNBC. ‘They’re not going to be in this bill.’” (Michael O’Brien, “Corker: Fannie And Freddie Left Out Of Financial Reform Bill,” The Hill’s “Blog Briefing Room,” 3/9/10)
Senate Dems Choose To Keep Fannie, Freddie Under Government Ownership, Which CBO Says Will Cost Taxpayers $389 Billion Over The Next Decade. “The Congressional Budget Office estimates that the total drain on taxpayers from bailing out Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae will be $389 billion through 2019.” (Jia Lynn Yang, “Freddie Mac Asks U.S. For $10 Billion As Losses Pile Up,” The Washington Post, 5/6/10)
  • Fannie And Freddie Will Likely “Be The Most Expensive Legacy” Of The Financial Crisis. “Fannie Mae asked the U.S. government for an additional $8.4 billion in aid after posting an $11.5 billion net loss for the first quarter, the latest sign that the bailout of the mortgage investor and its main rival, Freddie Mac, is likely to be the most expensive legacy of the U.S. housing-market bust.” (Nick Timiraos, “Fannie Mae Needs $8.4 Million More,” The Wall Street Journal, 5/11/10)
President Bill Clinton Admitted His Policies Regarding Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac Paved Way For Current Financial Crisis. “Clinton ... said that Democrats weren’t entirely blameless, stating that they should have highlighted problems with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and ‘tried more aggressively to regulate derivatives.’ He also acknowledged that there was possible danger in his administration’s policy of pressing Fannie Mae, the mortgage company, to lower its credit standards for lower- and middle-income families seeking homes. ‘I think, through the lens of this, it looks like that was true,’ Clinton said.” (Walter Alarkon, "Clinton Rejects Blame For Financial Crisis," The Hill, 9/25/08)
  • And Says That Blame For Crisis Rests With Democrats And His Administration For Resisting GOP Efforts To Reform Fannie And Freddie.  “I think the responsibility that the Democrats have may rest more in resisting any efforts by Republicans in the Congress, or by me when I was President, to put some standards and tighten up a little on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.” (Seth Colter Walls, “McCain Ad Uses President Clinton To Bash Democrats,” The Huffington Post, 10/31/08)
SENATE DEMS MAKE “OUTRAGEOUS” DECISION
AS FANNIE, FREDDIE ASK FOR $19 BILLION IN MORE TAXPAYER FUNDS
Fannie Mae Asks For $8.4 Billion In Taxpayer-Funded Bailouts This Year, After Already Receiving $84.6 Billion In Bailout Funds. “Fannie Mae, the largest U.S. residential mortgage funds provider, on Monday asked the government for an additional $8.4 billion after the company lost $13.1 billion in the first quarter. Including the latest request, Fannie Mae will have received more than $84.6 billion from the government, and the firm said it saw no end in sight to federal assistance.” (Corbett B. Daly and Lynn Adler, “Fannie Mae Seeks $8.4 Billion From Government After Loss,” ABC News, 5/11/10)
  •  And Freddie Mac Asks For $10.6 Billion Taxpayer-Funded Bailouts This Year, After Already Receiving $50.7 Billion In Bailout Funds, Totaling $19 Billion In Requested Money Between Two Housing Giants. “Since taking over Freddie, the government has provided $50.7 billion in help to the company. This new request for funds from the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which regulates Freddie and Fannie, would push that total to $61.3 billion.” (Jia Lynn Yang, “Freddie Mac Asks U.S. For $10 Billion As Losses Pile Up,” The Washington Post, 5/6/10)
NYU Finance Professor Says “It’s Outrageous” That Reform Of Fannie Mae And Freddie Mac Not Included In Obama-Dodd Bill. “Lawrence J. White, a finance professor at New York University, said it made no sense to overhaul financial regulation without addressing the future of federal housing policy. He said he was trying to find the strongest possible words to describe the omission of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from the legislation. ‘It’s outrageous,’ he finally said.” (Binyamin Appelbaum and Sewell Chan, “Senate Financial Bill Misguided, Some Academics Say,” The New York Times, 5/3/10)
  • And Joined Republicans Who Have “Repeatedly Criticized The Administration For Advancing Legislation That Does Not Address” Fannie And Freddie. “A second group of critics say the government helped to seed the crisis through its efforts to increase home ownership, including the role of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in buying mortgage loans to make more money available for lending … Republicans have repeatedly criticized the administration for advancing legislation that does not address the companies’ future.” (Binyamin Appelbaum and Sewell Chan, “Senate Financial Bill Misguided, Some Academics Say,” The New York Times, 5/3/10)