Search This Blog

Showing posts with label abuse. Show all posts
Showing posts with label abuse. Show all posts

Thursday, April 4, 2013

GROUPS LED BY INSIDER TRADER, CHILD ABUSER GOT OBAMACARE CO-OP LOANS

Groups led by insider trader, child abuser got Obamacare Co-Op loans

Millions of Americans may get their health insurance coverage through co-operatives being established under a $2 billion Obamacare program that has been shielded in secrecy and is now under investigation by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. (AP Photo)

Federal officials approved Obamacare loans totaling $127 million last year to groups led by individuals whose backgrounds included an insider trading conviction and another with a long history of child sexual abuse, The Washington Examiner has learned.

The loans -- which must be repaid at a future date -- are to fund health insurance co-operative startups in Louisiana and Maine. They will compete with private sector health insurance providers under a $2 billion Obamacare initiative to fund 24 co-op startups nationwide.

Both the Maine and Louisiana co-ops are among 13 under investigation by the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee headed by Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif.

In the Maine case, federal officials approved a $62 million loan to Maine Community Health Options even though its president had recently committed suicide after state police accused the co-op's president of molesting teenage boys for decades.

Despite extensive media coverage of the scandal, federal officials approved the loan five months before Maine State Police made public a 104-page report detailing the abuse allegations over a 36-year period.

The Louisiana case involves Louisiana Health Cooperative and CEO Terry Shilling. The Securities and Exchange Commission sanctioned Shilling in 1998 for "insider trading" as a health care executive.

The Department of Health and Human Services' Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight manages the loan awards.

In the Maine case, the Rev. Bob Carlson took his life after state police confronted him with the sexual abuse allegations.

Carlson had been widely respected as a civic and religious leader in Maine for many years. He served as a senior pastor at a church, chaplain at a local university and deputy sheriff. He was president of the Maine Primary Care Association and the Maine Community Health Options co-op.

But that image was shattered by the state police report's description of how Carlson took advantage of his positions to approach young boys from ages 11 to 18.

Officials also discovered after his suicide that Carlson had lied on his resume about his credentials, falsely claiming a bachelor's degree from the University of Maryland, as well as being a New York Theological Seminary graduate and having taken theological training at the Episcopal Theological Seminary in Cambridge, Mass.

Kevin Lewis, CEO of the Maine co-op, told The Washington Examiner that he informed federal officials four days after Carlson's suicide. The Maine loan was approved by CCIIO in April 2012, but the police report on Carlson's long history of abusing teenage boys only became public in August of that year.

Lewis said CCIIO did not consider the scandal to be a problem. "It was not really an issue in terms of the standing of our application," he said.

Spokesmen for CCIIO declined to comment.

In the Louisiana case, Schilling was sanctioned for insider trading while working at Georgia-based HealthSource Inc., where he bought 1,900 shares of that company's stock shortly after receiving a "confidential briefing" about an impending merger with CIGNA, according to the SEC.

Schilling was sanctioned and fined $10,000. Shilling left HealthSource prior to the merger, according to a CIGNA spokesman.

Even so, Schilling's group received a $65 million loan.

Neither Schilling nor CCIIO responded to a reporter's multiple telephone calls and emails seeking comment.

Judy Nadler, a government ethics expert and former mayor of Santa Clara, Calif., said the Obamacare co-op loan program needs much more transparency.

"How can individuals who have some negative experiences and scrapes with the law, how is it they could come to the top of the order when it comes to handing out the money?" she asked.

Tom Miller, a federal health expert at the American Enterprise Institute, doubts CCIIO did due diligence reviews. "What is the screening criteria, if any, or on what basis are these awards based?" he asked.

The Washington Examiner's previous stories on the Obamacare co-ops are here, here, here, here and here.

 Obamacare co-ops being created behind closed doors 


Secrecy shrouds President Obama's $2 billion program to launch 24 new co-ops designed to compete with private insurance companies under the chief executive's landmark health care reform.

An obscure agency in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has awarded loans of all but $100 million of the funds appropriated under President Obama's health care overhaul for the new organizations, known as Consumer Operated and Oriented Plans.

That worries some in Congress, including Rep. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., who told The Washington Examiner that "we want to know, what's their due diligence, what's their process, how are they arriving at these decisions? What are the protections in place for policyholders? Where are the protections for the U.S. taxpayer?"

The Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight, or CCIIO, approved applicants for the federal money even though few have any experience in providing health insurance to consumers. Under the law, the loans must be repaid.

CCIIO officials have not made public their criteria for evaluating loan applicants. Those officials declined to be interviewed.

The co-ops were proposed during the health care reform debate in Congress by then-Sen. Kent Conrad, D-N.D., as an acceptable alternative to the single-payer public option preferred by many Senate Democrats.

A 15-member panel set up by Obama's health care reforms to oversee the loans held only three public meetings, then disbanded 21 months ago. HHS paid consulting firm Deloitte $2.4 million to review loan applications, according to USAspending.gov. A Deloitte spokesman declined to comment.

The lack of openness became public last December when CCIIO denied the loan application of Illinois-based SimpleHx. "I really don't know why they choose one over the other," Coe Schlicher, a SimpleHx principal, told The Washington Examiner. "We have not found a way to gain access to the review process notes or the results of their scoring system."

Congress also has been kept in the dark. In an April 2012 letter, four leaders of the House Energy and Commerce Committee demanded that HHS produce information about the eligibility standards and decision-making process used for evaluating co-op loan applicants.

And in May 2012, Sens. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, and Michael Ezni, R-Wyo., asked for details about the program from HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius. Sebelius has responded to neither request.

Congressional leaders point to a 2013 Office of Management and Budget analysis that projected that as many as 43 percent of the co-ops could default. If that happens, taxpayers will foot the bill, as they did with bankrupt companies like Solyndra under Obama's clean energy subsidies.

Read More: The Washington Examiner

Failed Iowa entrepreneur awarded $112 million for Obamacare co-ops

Federal officials awarded $112 million to fund new Obamacare health insurance cooperatives in Iowa and Nebraska to a group whose politically connected chief financial officer recorded at least three business flops since 2009.

CoOportunity Health, an Ames, Iowa, group founded by CFO Stephen Ringlee, received the federal funds as a tax-free loan from the Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

The loans are part of an Obamacare initiative that includes $2 billion to fund groups selected behind closed doors by the CCIIO. Loans have been awarded to create co-ops to compete with private health insurers in 24 states so far.

The Washington Examiner recently exposed more than $500 million in CCIIO loans awarded to politically connected individuals to create co-ops in New York, New Jersey, Oregon, Illinois and Ohio.

The White House Office of Management and Budget has projected that as many as 43 percent of the startup co-ops will fail.

Ringlee appears at first glance to be a financial entrepreneur who could help emerging health insurance cooperatives. CoOportunity's website boasts that Ringlee "has more than 30 years of senior financial experience [and] 20 years of entrepreneurship and venture investing. ..."

But there is much more to the Ringlee story. He founded YourVive, an Amazon-style online green shopping club, in 2009, as well as American Food Venture Forum and International Venture Forum on Food, both in 2007.

YourVive was intended to be a high-profile "green" online shopping club, according to CoOportunity's website. A promotional brochure for the startup described YourVive as an "online marketplace that will offer green products at affordable prices."

Read More: http://washingtonexaminer.com/failed-iowa-entrepreneur-awarded-112-million-for-obamacare-co-ops/article/2525456

Friday, March 2, 2012

U.S. Government Agencies Manipulate Climate Data

This video shows that U.S. Government agencies have been involved in the systematic manipulation of climate data for decades. There has been a deliberate elimination of temperature measurement stations in colder climates around the globe. The result is that the remaining measurement stations are in warmer areas of the world. 


KUSI meteorologist, Weather Channel founder, and weatherman, John Coleman explains the science and the US government involvement in the Global Warming controversy.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=122109

http://www.kusi.com/weather/colemanscorner/40749822.html

An entire one hour Global Warming special hosted by John Coleman can be viewed here:
http://www.kusi.com/weather/colemanscorner/81583352.html

Source:  website EPA ABUSE    
YouTube Channel EPA ABUSE 

Friday, October 1, 2010

Pork 101~How Education Earmarks School Taxpayers by Senator Tom Coburn

Dr. Tom Coburn (R) Oklahoma has just released a report that exposes the misuse and abuse of our taxpayer dollars under the guise of Education reform.


Pork 101~How Education Earmarks School Taxpayers                                                            

This information is from Senator Coburn's website:

Sep 30 2010

Report Shows How Congress’ Parochial Education Projects are Harming Students, Delaying Reform and Undermining our Future

(WASHINGTON, D.C.) – U.S. Senator Tom Coburn, M.D. (R-OK) has released an oversight report on education earmarks entitled “Pork 101: How Education Earmarks School Taxpayers.”
“The tragic story of American education since 1965 shows that virtually all efforts to reform the system have failed. Every meaningful measure of academic proficiency has either gone down or failed to improve in spite billions of dollars of education spending. Of course, the problems in our system are manifold. Yet, instead of leading the nation in a serious discussion about how to improve education, Congress has made the problem worse. As this report documents, Congress’ obsession with its own self-interested parochial projects are harming students, delaying reform and undermining our future,” Dr. Coburn said.

“This report doesn’t suggest there is one easy answer. Instead, my goal is to force Congress to ask the hard questions it has avoided as it has embarked on a futile and counterproductive orgy of earmarking. In many cases, earmarked projects are not given to schools and colleges with the greatest need but those with the best lobbyists. Thankfully, the American people, local communities, and even filmmakers are way ahead of Congress in this debate. People of good faith across the spectrum understand that even if we solve our debt crisis will never revitalize our economy and secure our freedoms if we don’t improve our failing education system. This report, I hope, will give the American people information and insight that will help hold members of Congress accountable,” Dr. Coburn said.

The report focuses on two federal programs, each intended to spur innovation of the American educational system, that have become slush funds for congressional pork projects: the Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education (FIPSE) and the Fund for the Improvement of Education (FIE). These two programs fund 97 percent of all education pork projects. Over the last decade, Washington politicians obtained 5,563 earmarks costing nearly $2.3 billion through these programs.

Wasteful and egregious trends and projects highlighted in the report include the following:

• This decade, federal lawmakers secured over $181 million from FIPSE and FIE in support of honorary programs named after themselves and other politicians. (See pg. 40)

• Jackson State University received a nearly $500,000 FIPSE earmark to establish a school of osteopathic medicine despite having no intention of establishing the school. (See pg. 34)

• The U.S. Department of Education granted an extension of authority for an FIE earmarked project despite the fact that funds were being embezzled by its earmark manager, who is now serving 63 months in prison. (See pg. 36)

• A $200,000 FIPSE earmark was given to La Sierra University in California for a comprehensive university branding initiative. (See pg. 58)

• Oklahoma State University received a nearly $900,000 FIPSE earmark for a project that allowed participants to role play as members of Congress as they debate the current year’s budget and learn to responsibly negotiate budget decisions. (See pg. 45)

• Politicians have provided $3.2 million in FIPSE earmarks this decade to help fund scholarship and loan repayment programs for aspiring lawyers at Rutgers. (See pg. 38)

• $4.3 million has gone to support Big Labor through the National Labor College in Silver Spring, Maryland. (See pg. 55)

• A $200,000 FIPSE earmark went to Central Washington University for “curriculum development” – aka wine studies. (See pg. 57)

• In FY 2010, elected officials funneled a half million dollar FIE earmark to a private entity to develop an internet safety curriculum. Its cost was sufficient to prevent teacher layoffs in the school district where the private entity awarded the pork project was located. In fact, the earmark would have provided 65 percent of the district’s funding shortfall. (See pg. 30)

• Politicians provided the University of Hawaii - West Oahu a $200,000 FIPSE earmark to produce “Primal Quest,” a film documentary on some the most studied and photographed people in the world. (See pg. 57)

• A $25,000 FIE earmark went to Clark County School District in Las Vegas for mariachi music. (See pg. 56)

• While nobody likes negative children, it is a dubious national priority to earmark funds to deter negativity in children, yet lawmakers did just that. (See pg. 59)