Search This Blog

Thursday, March 8, 2012

She-PAC-Taking on the liberal attacks on Conservative women

What We Are
She·PAC is a political action committee with a two-fold purpose: (1.) To make contributions directly to the campaigns of principled conservative women running for federal office; and, (2.) To make expenditures on behalf of principled conservative women running for federal and statewide office.

If you're like us, you've had enough of the liberal attack machine targeting conservative women with vile, demeaning attacks. Nothing threatens the left more than a woman who rejects their idea of "feminism" and embraces solidly conservative, pro-American values. Luckily, more and more of these kinds of women -- principled leaders who are unapologetic in their views -- are stepping up and running for office at all levels of government. 

She·PAC was created to get more of these women into office. Not only will we make contributions directly to their campaigns, we will take to the front lines with the resources necessary to counter the smear merchants of the left. We know that conservative women will fight for us, now we need to fight for them.

March 7, 2012
As recently as March 1st Bill Burton, cofounder of Priorities USA Action SuperPAC, was promoting the views of a donor who referred to women in violent, hateful and derogatory ways. Today, we call on Mr. Burton to follow President Obama's lead and reject this language and messenger. Please see full text of the letter below. 

Dear Mr. Burton:

Having watched President Obama’s press conference yesterday afternoon we find ourselves in agreement with him regarding the inflammatory issues that have arisen in the media. We are sure we can all agree we have arrived at what the President might call a "teachable moment".

We were pleased to see Rush Limbaugh apologize for his incredibly unkind and insensitive remarks towards women during his recent radio broadcast. These types of remarks towards women have no place in public discourse – they are wrong, and offensive.

It was an important gesture that President Obama approved the time in his schedule to place a call to the woman to whom the offensive remarks were directed.  As parents of daughters ourselves, we were proud when we heard him say he took a personal stand on this issue with the hopes of always allowing his daughters the ability to have their own beliefs in the future.  President Obama said, "One of the things I want them to do as they get older is to engage in issues they care about, even ones I may not agree with them on."

President Obama has categorically condemned this sort of language against any woman.  We are calling on you today to put the President's words to action by condemning the equally egregious and despicable behavior of HBO talk show host Bill Maher.  Mr. Maher has a history of attacking women and recently attacked a host of women including a specifically violent attack at one woman who regularly, as the President says, “engages in the issues she cares about” and is a mother of three daughters and grandmother.

Mr. Maher, who disagrees with Sarah Palin's politics, has called her a litany of adjectives inappropriate to repeat in any setting and are of the most derogatory of terms reserved for only violent verbal hate crimes against women.  We understand that he has donated $1 million dollars of his personal money paid to him through various businesses that thrive on the ratings of his hate speech to your Priorities USA Action to aid in your efforts to re-elect President Obama.

President Obama eloquently stated today in his press conference that, "all decent folks can agree that the remarks that were made don't have any place in the public discourse.”

We are certain you agree with him, as do we that these types of remarks have no place in our society and the people that unapologetically make them must not be allowed to purchase a seat at the table of public discourse. Therefore, we are calling on Priorities USA Action and you to live up to the standard set by President Obama and take Mr. Maher’s million dollars and pay it forward.
Prove to American’s that your group is run by “decent folks” that President Obama speaks of. Donate this money to a charity of your choosing that focuses on supporting abused women and children.

We look forward to your action and joining with the President in ending hate speech against women.


Teri Christoph, Co-Chair of ShePAC                      
Suzanne Haik Terrell, Co-Chair of ShePAC
Tim Crawford, Treasurer of ShePAC

She-Pace Facebook  Twitter  You Tube

Can She-PAC Help Republicans Solve Their Woman Problem?

GOP women want to elect more of their own through a conservative counterweight to EMILY's List.

Suzanne Terrell discovered just how hard it is for a conservative woman to run for office when she lost a close, high-profile race against Sen. Mary Landrieu of Louisiana in 2002. Terrell got plenty of help from the party establishment, including the National Republican Senatorial Committee and the Bush administration. But she says that beyond incumbency, it was clear that Landrieu had another edge: Strong organization and support from women.

“There’s a dearth of organizations on the conservative side that are dedicated to raising up women in the political process,” Terrell said. “There’s a lack of a structure that women can depend on to help them to get to where they can be effective.”

Enter She-PAC, a new group that aims to pour millions of dollars into the campaigns of conservative women running for state and federal office, and to mobilize the women’s vote in the fall. And it could not come at a better time for the GOP.

If there’s a single visual representation of the perils of the party’s male-female imbalance, it was the picture of the all-male “birth control panel” that was widely circulated recently during the flap over the Obama administration’s controversial contraception rule. The merits of the policy aside, most observers agree that the optics were a public-relations failure for Republicans and one that might have been avoided if more GOP women were roaming the halls of power.

Some of the Republican Party’s most prominent figures—including former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley, and Sen. Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire—are women, but their presence belies some dismal statistics. Only 24 Republican women serve in the House and five in the Senate, compared with the Democrats’ 51 female House members and 12 senators. The GOP fares better in the statehouse: Four of the six female governors are Republicans.

Debbie Walsh, director of the Center for American Politics at Rutgers University and cofounder of the 2012 Project, a nonpartisan initiative to elect a record number of women to office this year, said there has been an uptick of conservative women harboring political ambitions since Palin’s historic 2008 run. But the infrastructure on the right hasn’t quite caught up, she said. There’s no equivalent yet on the conservative side to EMILY’s List, which supports female Democratic candidates who back abortion rights and in 2010 raised $38.5 million to help them, according to the group’s spokesperson.

She-PAC will function both as a traditional political action committee that gives directly to campaigns and as a super PAC, an outside group that can spend unlimited amounts of money in election efforts so long as it doesn’t directly coordinate with a campaign. The group has ambitions of raising $25 million this year.

“The Republican Party could do more with spotting some of those women that are toiling in the vineyards in various ways and say, ‘Come on! We can help you!’ ” said former Rep. Connie Morella, R-Md., who served in Congress from 1987 to 2003. “We may not have the kind of money the others have, and we’re not sure of the support from our own party.”

Among current GOP leaders, recognition is growing that the party risks alienating women if it doesn’t have female representation at the highest levels. Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, R-Wash, vice chairman of the House Republican Conference and the highest-ranking Republican woman in the House, said that aggressive recruitment efforts for 2012 are already under way. She also points to progress already made--a record nine Republican women elected to the House in 2010.

The co-chairs of She-PAC, Terrell and Teri Christoph, are veterans when it comes to helping conservative women connect and find resources. Terrell created Project GOPink (“Empowering Republican Women With The Tools To Succeed”) after losing to Landrieu, and Christoph cofounded Smart Girl Politics (“Engage. Educate. Empower.”). Tim Crawford, a former adviser to Palin and treasurer of her political action committee, SarahPAC, will also manage finances for She-PAC.

Christoph and Terrell say that the barriers keeping conservative women out of politics are the same ones that have always kept the number of women in public office in the United States low: the increasingly negative tenor of political campaigns, the pressure and scrutiny on their families, and the lack of mentors and role models.

“It’s tough to be a conservative women running for office. They get really bad treatment from the press and from the other side,” Christoph said. “They think, ‘Why would I put my family through what they put Sarah Palin through?’ ”

Morella said she sees a connection between the squeezing out of moderates in Congress and the scant numbers of Republican women. Morella and fellow GOP moderates like Maine senators Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins used to be less of an oddity within the party. “The Republican tent has been closing for men as well as women,” Morella said. “The whole concept of conservative—I don’t really know what it means.”

She-PAC has not yet developed its criteria for evaluating candidates. Endorsement decisions will largely depend on the circumstances of each race, Terrell said. She expects “spirited conversations” as the group moves forward. She and Christoph are taking a long view. “I don’t think it’s going to change in one election cycle,” Christoph said. “It’s going to take many, many cycles until we start getting the numbers in balance."

CORRECTION: An earlier version of this article gave an inaccurate fundraising figure for EMILY’s List.

No comments:

Post a Comment